No other animals from the deep past capture
our imaginations like dinosaurs. Any kid old enough to hold a crayon can probably
draw one. And we older kids have our own images that
come to mind when we think of the terrible lizards. But the reason that we have to imagine the
non-avian dinosaurs, of course, is that they’re extinct. Thankfully, a ton of science has gone into
our understanding of how dinosaurs looked, and acted. But the truth is, we’ve only had a few hundred
years to bring that picture into focus. So if you page through a book about natural
history, or stroll through a museum hall, you’ll get some idea of what paleontologists
think dinosaurs looked like. But even the most up-to-date restorations
of our prehistoric favorites are only part of the story. Because our image of dinosaurs has been constantly
changing — evolving, you might say — ever since naturalists started studying them about
350 years ago. And this evolution is reflected in hundreds
of years’ worth of drawings, paintings, and models of dinosaurs, each made in an attempt
to get us a little closer to visualizing animals that have been lost to time. Taken together, these pictures can tell us
a whole lot about just how much we’ve learned in just a short three and a half centuries. So today, we’re going to explore the history
of dinosaur science, as seen through the history of dinosaur art. When naturalists first started to find dinosaur
bones, they didn’t quite know what to make of them … as you can tell from the very
first illustration of a dino fossil ever published. Back in 1677 — more than 160 years before
the word “dinosaur” was even coined — an English chemist named Robert Plot published
his Natural History of Oxfordshire, a catalog of rocks, minerals and fossils from his home
county. And it included a drawing of a strange bone
that had been found in a limestone quarry. Plot could tell that it was the end of a femur,
or a thigh bone. But it was clearly from an animal far larger
than any living in England at that time. He suggested that the thigh fragment might
have belonged to a Roman war elephant, or maybe even a giant human. But it turned out that, in his book, Plot
had given the world the very first scientific illustration of a dinosaur fossil. In 1763, English naturalist Richard Brookes
re-printed Plot’s illustration, in a six-volume set he called A System of Natural History. And Brookes bestowed a name on the fossil. In a caption of Plot’s picture, he called
the specimen Scrotum humanum. Because…really? Because although he knew it was a piece of
a femur, he thought it looked like … a pair of human testicles. Paleontologists now know that bone belonged
to Megalosaurus, a dinosaur named by WIlliam Buckland in 1824. Working from some more and better material
— including a lower jaw and teeth — Buckland was able to tell that this animal was a previously-unknown
kind of carnivorous reptile. To Buckland’s mind, the creature looked
not like a giant, or an even elephant, but like a crocodile — although, one about the size
of a bus. And from this time we still have a lithograph
of the crucial fossil — the one that established Megalosaurus as a new, fierce form of ancient
life. From these rather inauspicious beginnings
— cases of mistaken identity involving war elephants and human genitals — the idea started
to sink in that dinosaurs were something truly special — specifically, a kind of reptile
that used to exist, but didn’t any more. But, in the early 1800s, scientists still
pictured dinosaurs as being much like the modern reptiles they knew. The English physician Gideon Mantell, for
example, figured that if dinosaurs were reptiles, then they must’ve basically been just giant
lizards. Based on some fossil teeth that he found in
Sussex, Mantell was convinced that he had found the prehistoric equivalent of an iguana
— albeit one about 30 meters long. He made a sketch of the creature’s skeleton
in his personal notes, following the same skeletal plan of the modern lizard. And in 1825 he officially gave the animal
the name Iguanodon, or “iguana tooth.” A few years later, Mantell was visited by
artist John Martin. Martin was famous for his paintings of dramatic,
apocalyptic scenes, like his 1822 painting, The Destruction of Pompeii. And after meeting Mantell, Martin used his
vision of the Iguanodon to create the first — and maybe the most over-the-top — scene
of dinosaur combat ever committed to canvas. This painting, The Country of the Iguanodon is all coils
and teeth and claws. It’s all very… Rawr. And at the time, it summed up what experts
thought ancient reptiles were like: Giant, vicious lizards who hissed and snapped at
each other. But all that was about to change. British anatomist Richard Owen proposed that
Megalosaurus, Iguanodon, and another newly discovered animal, called Hylaeosaurus, all
shared special physical traits — found in their hips and other bones — that made them
different from all other reptiles. And in 1842, he came up with a new name for
this form of extinct life: “dinosaur,” from the Greek for “terrible lizard.” But Owen went even further than that. Dinosaurs weren’t just supersized lizards,
he said. In many ways, they resembled mammals in their
structure and their stance. And Owen portrayed his vision of dinosaurs
not on paper, or canvas, but in three dimensions! For England’s Great Exhibition of 1854,
Owen worked with artist Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins to create life-sized versions of dinosaurs
and other ancient creatures, as he pictured them. The models were so immense that Hawkins even
famously held a New Years’ banquet inside a model of Iguanodon! And when the models were unveiled to the public,
they became the new image of what we thought dinosaurs looked like. These animals were built more like rhinos,
carrying their legs under their bodies, but with scaly skin and tails that dragged on
the ground behind them. And it was other new insights into dinosaurs’
legs that led to the next big shift in how we imagined the animals. Most of the earliest dinosaur fossils were
found in Europe and were extremely fragmented. Sometimes it was hard to tell which parts
went with which. But when naturalists started looking in North
America, they found more complete skeletons that made paleontologists completely re-think
dinosaurs. A pair of critical finds were made in New
Jersey. In 1858, a farmer found the bones of an animal
we now call Hadrosaurus. The skeleton wasn’t complete, but there
were enough parts of the arms, legs, and tail to know that the forelimbs of this dinosaur
were shorter than the hindlimbs. Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins was called in
again to reconstruct the dinosaur’s skeleton for the public in Philadelphia, the first
one to be put on display anywhere. And what was weird about this model was that
… it stood on two legs! The discovery of a carnivorous dinosaur also
in New Jersey, eventually named Dryptosaurus, showed that it was bipedal, too. And its discoverer, the notoriously cranky
American paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope, drew the dinosaur in a crouched, kangaroo-like
pose, totally different from Owen’s Megalosaurus. Better finds only added fuel to this revolution
in how we pictured dinosaurs. The discovery of a whole herd of Iguanodon
in a Belgian coal mine in 1878, including complete skeletons, confirmed that those dinosaurs
had short arms and long legs, suggesting that they were also largely bipedal And the discovery of entirely new genera,
like Stegosaurus, Brontosaurus, and Triceratops, showed that dinosaurs were stranger and
more diverse than anything paleontologists expected. Bone by bone and skeleton by skeleton, a new
image of dinosaurs started to take hold. Even though they were still classified as
reptiles, by late 19th century, they were seen as acting more like mammals or birds
than like lizards. An important painting from 1896 drives this
point home. Charles R. Knight, working for the American
Museum of Natural History, illustrated a moment of vicious combat between two snarling Dryptosaurus. These weren’t Martin’s dragon-like lizards,
or Owen’s rhino-like reptiles. Instead, they were agile, bird-like dinosaurs
unlike anything we’d seen before. Then, at the start of the 20th century, the
scientific opinion on dinosaurs shifted yet again. By this point, dinosaurs were seen as big
and weird and scary — great for drawing museum crowds! — but their reputation was starting
to tarnish. If dinosaurs were so great, some paleontologists
wondered, then why’d they go extinct? Instead of being awe-inspiring, dinos came
to be seen as inferior, an evolutionary failure. And this attitude was reflected in the paleo-art
of the time, which depicted dinosaurs as slow, lumbering beasts — usually stuck in some
swamp. Don’t get me wrong, the artists of this time depicted these scenes
beautifully. Artists like Knight, Zdeněk Burian, and Rudolph
Zallinger created some of the most iconic and detailed dinosaur art of all time. They filled books and museums with their work,
and you can still see many of their murals on display at places like the Field Museum
and the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. It’s just that, their generation saw dinosaurs
as tubby, dimwitted losers in the evolutionary game of life. By the late 1960s, though, new finds had experts
questioning what they thought they knew about dinosaurs. The key here was the discovery of Deinonychus-
the inspiration for Jurassic Park’s tenacious “raptors” – by American paleontologist
John Ostrom in 1969. This small carnivore had a stiff, counterbalancing
tail, and a wicked, sickle-shaped, “killing claw” on each of its feet. It was impossible to envision this thing as
a sluggish, dumb reptile. It was nimble and dynamic, even … one might say…birdlike. This revelation sparked what came to be known
as the Dinosaur Renaissance of the 1970s and 80s. It opened up old debates and sparked new ones,
transforming what we thought dinosaurs were like. And paleoart went along for the ride! What paleontologists were doing in labs and
museums, illustrators like Greg Paul, Ely Kish, Douglas Henderson, and more were doing
with their sketches and paintings. In the work of these artists, dinosaurs’
tails were lifted off the ground, their postures were adjusted, and they were shown running,
jumping, clawing, and biting with greater vigor than ever before. And of course, as with anything that evolves,
our image of dinosaurs hasn’t stopped changing. These days, paleontologists are finding more
dinosaurs than ever. In fact, a new species is now being named,
on average, every two weeks! But more importantly, we’re learning a lot
more about dinosaur biology, like their anatomy and physiology. In addition to fossil bones, researchers are
now studying things like skin impressions, feathers, and other soft tissues — giving
us a fuller picture of not only how these animals looked, but how they moved and what
they could, and couldn’t, do. In particular, the discovery of dozens of
dinosaurs with feathers and fuzz has totally changed how we see some of our favorites. And recent paleo-artwork has reflected these changes. Artists like Julius Csotonyi, Gabriel Ugueto,
Nobu Tamura and Emily Willoughby are incorporating the latest insights from the field, and they’re
also using new technology, like 3D scans, to re-create dinos in more detail than ever. Where paleoartists of old worked with paint
and lithographs, many modern artists have gone digital, rendering new visions of prehistoric
life as soon as they’re announced. What really sets these modern paleoartists
apart is how they draw on the traditions of previous generations, while also challenging
the tropes and ideas that came before. Paleoart is now in its great Experimental
Phase, reflecting what we expect dinosaurs were like, while also speculating about what
we don’t yet know. But the lesson here isn’t that modern paleoart
is right, while earlier editions were wrong. The art of dinosaurs is always a reflection
of the time it’s made in. Just as dinosaurs themselves evolved, so have
our thoughts about their lives. Paleoart is a living document of these alterations. We’ve come a long way from the days when
we thought the fossils of dinosaurs represented a race of giants, or big lizards, or bulky
pseudo-mammals. And a hundred years from now, natural historians
may look back on the illustrations we use today and marvel at just how wrong we were. Thankfully, the more science reveals to us
about the nature of the non-avian dinos, the closer we get to representing the truth
in our illustrations. But as long as dinosaurs remain extinct, there
might always be a little part of them that we’ll just have to imagine for ourselves. What do you want to know about the story of
life on Earth? Let us know in the comments. And don’t forget to go to
and subscribe! But the fun doesn’t end here! Do yourself a favor and check out some of
our sister channels from PBS Digital Studios.

Author Since: Mar 11, 2019

  1. Where did you guys get your cover picture from.
    I saw it on a Kickstarter RPG book and thought it was an original work.

  2. Truly a top video on this channel, thank you! It got me wondering whether the discovery of dinosaur fossils was the first time we realised that some animals were extinct. Or, was that already known from other sources? It strikes me that the realisation that species could become extinct must have been quite a profound change in our understanding of the world.

  3. aguantaria que encontraran fosilizados dos huevotes de dinosaurio(en Mexico ´huevos´ es una palabra para testiculos)y ver que tan machos eran estas lagartijas, ja, ja, ja; hablando mas en serio recuerdo que en los 80s siendo una niña sentia fascinacion por los dinosaurios, leyendas de dragones, evolucion de las aves, y reptiles del Paleozoico, y demas fauna prehistorica, mi padre toda la vida dijo que los dinosaurios eran de sangre caliente y tenian plumas/pelos en sus cuerpos; y dicho y hecho, pasaron de ser animales torpes, feos, lentos de sangre fria a ser criaturas dinamicas, agiles, e inteligentes casi en sentido diabolico(gracias Jurassic Park)o incluso hasta lindos o tiernos : ) , la ciencia actualmente admite que si eran de sangre caliente y son ilustrados con peluchito y toda la cosa o como bellas criaturas con plumas multicolores, si que los tiempos cambian ¿eh?, me pregunto si al rato descubriran(o quizas ya han descubierto) fosiles de dinosaurios humanoides (tipo como el que hizo Dale Russell) o restos de sus civilizaciones que muy probablemente hubo, seria increible eso, y si todavia me gustan mucho mis monstruos prehistoricos, me hace feliz verlos tanto en libros de colorear, en la tele, revistas, peliculas y tambien aqui en Youtube/Google, extintos fisicamente pero muy vivos en nuestra imaginacion.

  4. I don't mean to be insensitive, but you sort of look entirely different in every video I've watched so far. It's spooky. Haven't seen anything like this since I noticed that Rich Eisen is always taking his glasses off, yet somehow never seems to put them on. These are the Bermuda Triangles of Youtube.

  5. Love, love pbs eons! But would this video be better served by the title "History of Dinosaur Illustrations" instead?

  6. Fun fact about megalosaurus and iguanodon that many people seem to get wrong. Many people believe that megalosaurus was the first dinosaur to be identified. However this isn't entirely accurate. See megalosaurus was the first dinosaur to be discovered. And the first to be named. However the first dinosaur to be scientifically identified as a dinosaur was the iguanodon

  7. This is definitely one of my favourite videos on this entire channel, love the analysis and rationale given throughout each phase. Dont know how this channel doesn't have millions of subs.

  8. U said remain extinct at the end there. Youve made me very curious. A question for all.. can something become un extinct? I wonder lol

  9. please stop wearing grey. you are already bland enough, color wise. put some color or depth, something other than grey on. other than that i really like Eons.

  10. Let it be know these great men and women of the past were not stupid for making these mistakes. What they faced was an entirely new field of study if living things that no longer exist. So imagination had to be used in order to paint the picture, so to speak. Like modern scientists they only had what they knew at the time and what they could think of. With so many possibilities available especially from such little evidence.

  11. Scrotum Humanum. Just goes to show that boy humor transcends age, maturity and historical era……

  12. Checking the comment section to make sure I’m not the only one who thinks the first dinosaur illustration looks like a ballsack…

  13. There is not the first thin shred of empirical evidence to support the existence of any "dinosaur". All "dinosaur" exhibits are 100% fraudulent.

  14. wait isnt it that the first name given to a fossil is the species name? would it not be funny if they stayed with scrotum humanum instead of megalosaurus. *Next Jurassic World "Watch out the Human Testicles escaped and they hunting us" or a documentary "Walking with Human Testicles" but okay its Megalosaurus i guess.

  15. I don’t think dinosaurs were colorful or had markings. If you look at any large land animal today like the Cape buffalo, rhino, and elephant, they are all gray or black. The Komodo dragon and crocodile are gray or black too.

  16. Dinosaurs through art…what an original take! And thanks for naming the dino-artists and showing their works.

  17. how far we are of recreating a dino?
    I saw a new that Paleontologists found blood cels inside a bone of dino. Why dont use it to try recreate the same DNA composition and then insert it inside cels and see what it become?

  18. all you need to do see how dinosaurs actually looked like are the following : to planet 65 million light years away from the earth right now .(the earth you will see from there is the earth of 65 million years ago.)
    2 . get a telescope that is powerful enough to see the life on the planet surface from there.
    3 . enjoy the show.

  19. “As long as dinosaurs remain extinct…” WHAT?!? Did we all watch the Jurassic Park movies for nothing? YOU KNOW HOW THIS ENDS YALL! .

  20. Ok, question.
    How is there enough proteins and such in an egg to create a new little being?
    Eyes, lungs, etc. without needing more.

  21. Would be fascinating to discover that an animal alive today, previously classified as a reptile, was linked to having closer relations with birds; meaning that a smaller, living branch of non-avian dinosaurs still inhabits dense forests of today.

  22. Megalosaurus : I'm the first dinosaur ever found, and the most popular one !
    1902 = T.Rex is discovered
    person : I love T.Rex !
    person 2 : Do you remember megalosaurus ?
    person : Megalo…….what ?
    Megalosaurus : 😓

  23. 6:55 It also turned out that what had given them the name "Iguana tooth" turned out to be much closer to a prehistoric dagger then a tooth.

  24. I wont lie, I became Mad when I hear than we use to think of them as "Evolutionary Lossers", how dare them to think that!!! ¬¬

  25. This is so awesome….I recognized so many of these pictures from dinobooks of my youth (I'm 33 atm) and so much has been revised since the last three decades. Childhood feelings are coming back right now 😀

  26. 8:27 Hey the Peabody Museum!! I used to go there all the time as a kid.

    There was a lot of talk about changing the mural bc it’s not scientifically accurate but I’m glad they kept it around. It shows how scientists have learned so much more about dinosaurs since the mural was originally painted. Science is wrong sometimes and it’s important to remember that.

  27. Huh whaaa?? I'm sorry , I obviously didn't hear that correctly……I could have sworn at 3:33 you had said "Mantell was convinced he had found the prehistoric equivalent of an iguana , albeit one that was 30 meters long." Clearly I heard that incorrectly and will be grabbing a q-tip post haste and cleaning the excessive build up of ear wax in my ears that would have caused me to think you had just said "30 meters" in reference to the Iguanadon's length. That would make the Iguanadon as long as the blue whale and longer than most sauropod species were and as we all know that's……well, that's just silly. lol All of that aside, this was a great video (as always!) You guys are constantly catering to my insatiable hunger for prehistoric biology!

  28. Ah yes, the Scrotus Bluemanus , known through out the world of 'guys who aren't getting any' as 'The Blue Balls' . That doesn't include me, of course. I'm constantly beating off…………..I mean ,ooops……not that……I'm constantly beating off ….um, the women! Yes,of course, the women, beating them off with a stick, as they are throwing themselves at me all day….and night as well! Pheew! I mean , there's no Blue….. no Scrotus Bluemanus here, no sir…, not , not ever….

  29. I like to think that when we sadly go extinct the next sapient species of will make art of us. Maybe at first they will think we're knuckle Walker's like are ape cousins but hopefully they will discover that we were bipedal sapient creatures maybe they will discover that we even went to other planets, hopefully I'm right and we won't be comply lost to time.

  30. Technically a furred “dinosaur” doesn’t exist because furred animals were early mammals. Fur would be completely counterintuitive to the Dino’s because they warm up by using the sun’s energy and fur would only block that ability from being any use

  31. dinosaurs are Evolutionary Failures? sorry i have to dissagree on that. dinosaurs are way more evulotionary than us humans. we humans are killing each other and are now at the point of extinction by our own faults. while dinosaurs lived long and are very big and could live probably hondred milions of extra years, had the meteorite not been impacted the eart. yes, i believe that we humans (who are now making the world into a new extinction event because of Global Warming and Warfare) are Evolutionary Failures, and i hate myself by beeing human.
    but thats just my opinion and take it with a grain of salt.
    by the way, Stegosaurus will always be my favorite dinosaur.

  32. The artist John Martin was taught by my great-grandfather (not sure how many greats) Boniface Musso and his son Charles Muss.

  33. Burian's dinosaurs weren't that much different from Knight's or the renaissance ones, it was more of an intermediate. And arguably Knight's Laelaps fight was exaggerated even for today's standards, even if they were "updated" with feathers, two or three digits in their hands. They're smaller relatives of Tyrannosaurs, but still much bigger than Jurassic Park's pseudo "Velociraptor". With that size, it's very unlikely they would fight jumping in the air like roosters or leopards. So, in a way, Burian moved them a little more to the right direction, even if still inaccurate in aspects of gait and anatomy. But his T. rex wouldn't drag his tail around either; even with an exaggerated upright posture, the tail is suspended, almost a precursor to Mark Hallett. The artist who better represents the "dark ages" of dinosaur paleoart is perhaps Zallinger. Back then people even theorized things along the lines of dinosaurs going extinct due to evolving into morbid obesity.

  34. Have you check out the popular video game The Isle? It’s a game where you can play as a somewhat modern accurate incarnation of Dinosaur from both Carnivore as well as Herbivore! I have lost countless hours in this amazing title playing as either a pachycephalosaurus or Allosaurus!

Related Post